THOMPSON VS GREASE GUN

Forums > Rifles-N-Guns Community > Gun Discussion > THOMPSON VS GREASE GUN
  • Login to post a new forum topic.
fred ballou
Major General
Points: 1098
Jul 28, 2007 3:27 pm

IF YOU COULD OWN IT . OR JUST SHOOT ONE.WICH WOULD IT BE . I OWN THREE THOMPSONS 1927A1,WEST HURLY N.Y., 1927A1 WORCESTER MASS. M1A WORCESTER MASS.I JUST GOT THE WEST HURLY WITH 4 DIGET SERIAL # NICE

‹ Pistol VS Revolver WWI and WWII weapons information ›
Jollyroger
Major General
Points: 812
Jul 28, 2007 6:14 pm

Sweet find on the Tommies. In a contest it's the Thompson hands down. High rate of fire, accurate, powerful, and reliable. In my opinion it is just as good as the MP5.

"We deal in Lead, friend." Steve Mcqueen from the Magnificent Seven.
randolphbr549
Sergeant Major of the Army
Points: 35
Aug 1, 2007 7:47 am

working incognito
in 1982 i qualified with the 45 grease gun.what a piece of crap.talk about misfires and jamming.without a doulbt the cheapest weapon are government ever put into service.they started makeing these during the second world war.and i think they cost about five dollars a piece to make.the cheif of police in my hometown has one in his office an officer conviscated in 1969 off an individual and he use it as a paper weight.the original thompson's the pre war models were heavy but good quality guns.
ak_sniper90
Major
Points: 222
Aug 4, 2007 3:00 pm

the thompson with drum magazine b/c I like whith in WW2 used by Officers or NCO's commanding a sqaud but yeah thats me many people has other option and more different
hunter1099
Sergeant First Class
Points: 6
Aug 8, 2007 9:11 am

I had an grease gun in nam,piece of crap the only thing good thing about the m-3 was the weight thompson loaded was on the heavy side but it worked unlike the m-3 jam city.
Osiris5432
Lieutenant Colonel
Points: 360
Aug 10, 2007 11:22 am

well the grease gun could be made for just a few dollars during WWII and you get what you pay for in a gun.